Bleeding Control Protections Within US Good Samaritan Laws.

INTRODUCTION: In the United States, all 50 states and the District of Columbia have Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs). Designed to encourage bystanders to aid at the scene of an emergency, GSLs generally limit the risk of civil tort liability if the care is rendered in good faith. Nation-wide, a leading cause of preventable death is uncontrolled external hemorrhage. Public bleeding control initiatives aim to train the public to recognize life-threatening external bleeding, perform life-sustaining interventions (including direct pressure, tourniquet application, and wound packing), and to promote access to bleeding control equipment to ensure a rapid response from bystanders. METHODS: This study sought to identify the GSLs in each state and the District of Columbia to identify what type of responder is covered by the law (eg, all laypersons, only trained individuals, or only licensed health care providers) and if bleeding control is explicitly included or excluded in their Good Samaritan coverage. RESULTS: Good Samaritan Laws providing civil liability qualified immunity were identified in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. One state, Oklahoma, specifically includes bleeding control in its GSLs. Six states - Connecticut, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, and Missouri - have laws that define those covered under Good Samaritan immunity, generally limiting protection to individuals trained in a standard first aid or resuscitation course or health care clinicians. No state explicitly excludes bleeding control from their GSLs, and one state expressly includes it. CONCLUSION: Nation-wide across the United States, most states have broad bystander coverage within GSLs for emergency medical conditions of all types, including bleeding emergencies, and no state explicitly excludes bleeding control interventions. Some states restrict coverage to those health care personnel or bystanders who have completed a specific training program. Opportunity exists for additional research into those states whose GSLs may not be inclusive of bleeding control interventions.

Trauma Registry Professionals' Perspectives on the Secondary Traumatic Stress Component of Compassion Fatigue: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Secondary traumatic stress and compassion fatigue have been studied among trauma clinicians yet have not been explored in trauma registry professionals (TRPs). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe the secondary traumatic stress component of compassion fatigue among TRPs. METHODS: A qualitative, phenomenological study was conducted to examine TRPs' experiences with the secondary traumatic stress component of compassion fatigue. The primary investigator assembled a multidisciplinary team of researchers, including nursing leadership, registry educators, mental health experts, and qualitative researchers. Two focus groups were held virtually in January 2021, using an interview guide designed by the research team. Participants were recruited via an email sent to a list of colleagues known to the research team from training classes held nationally and selected for their diverse clinical experiences, years in the role, demographic background, and trauma center representation. The recorded sessions were independently transcribed and analyzed by a five-member subgroup of the research team; the analysis concluded in December 2022. RESULTS: Nine TRPs participated in the focus groups. Participants came from Level I, II, and III adult and pediatric trauma centers and military centers. Four themes emerged from the data: disquieting and rewarding work, reactions and emotional responses, the influence of personal histories and background, and coping strategies. CONCLUSION: A qualitative analysis of focus group discussions revealed the secondary traumatic stress component of compassion fatigue is present in the TRP.

Safety and Efficacy of Twice-Daily Pilocarpine HCl in Presbyopia: The Virgo Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Masked, Controlled Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of pilocarpine hydrochloride 1.25% (Pilo hereafter) compared with vehicle when administered bilaterally, twice daily (6 hours apart) for 14 days in participants with presbyopia. DESIGN: Phase 3, randomized (1:1), controlled, double-masked, multicenter study. METHODS: Participants (40-55 years of age) had objective and subjective evidence of presbyopia affecting daily activities with mesopic, high-contrast, binocular distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) of 20/40 to 20/100. The primary/key secondary endpoint was the proportion of participants gaining ≥3 lines in mesopic/photopic, high-contrast, binocular DCNVA on day 14 (last study visit), hour 9 (3 hours after the second dose), with no more than a 5-letter loss in mesopic/photopic corrected distance visual acuity with the same refractive correction. Key safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and some ocular measurements. Pilocarpine plasma levels were assessed in approximately 10% of enrolled participants. RESULTS: Overall, 230 participants were randomized to Pilo twice daily (N = 114) and vehicle (N = 116). The proportion of participants achieving the primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints was statistically significantly greater with Pilo twice daily than vehicle, with between-treatment differences of 27.3% (95% CI = 17.3, 37.4) and 26.4% (95% CI = 16.8, 36.0), respectively. The most common TEAE was headache, reported in 10 participants (8.8%, Pilo group) and 4 participants (3.4%, vehicle group). Pilocarpine's accumulation index on day 14 was ≤1.11 after the second dose. CONCLUSIONS: Near-vision improvements were statistically greater with Pilo twice daily than with vehicle, without compromising distance acuity. The safety profile of Pilo twice daily was consistent with that of Pilo once daily, and systemic accumulation was minimal, supporting twice daily administration.

Subgroups in the treatment of nasal polyposis with dupilumab: A retrospective study.

Dupilumab has been shown to be safe and effective in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis (CRSwNP). There is to this date no published data whether subgroups like patients with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), increased histologic eosinophilia or elevated blood eosinophil or IgE-levels benefit greater from dupilumab therapy. Moreover, there is no data comparing the efficacy of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with dupilumab therapy. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients that were treated at a tertiary referral center for CRswNP with dupilumab. We also contacted the patients with a questionnaire to evaluate the efficacy of previous surgeries and dupilumab therapy by visual analogue scale (VAS) and the glasgow benefit inventory (GBI) as well as report on side effects. Overall, 75 patients were included in the study at hand that reported back 138 times. While dupilumab treatment was efficient, we found no systematic evidence of greater efficacy of dupilumab in patients with AERD, histologic eosinophilia or increased blood eosinophil or IgE-levels. All patients showed a considerable decrease in subjective burden of disease, objective smell tests and endoscopic findings. From the patients point of view, dupilumab therapy showed greater efficacy both in the VAS and the GBI overall and all subcategories but "social support." Dupilumab is efficient in treating CRSwNP; this effect is independent from disease characteristics like AERD, histologic eosinophilia, serum IgE-levels or eosinophil counts. There seems to be a group of patients that benefit greater from dupilumab therapy compared to FESS.

Family still matters: Human social motivation across 42 countries during a global pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused drastic social changes for many people, including separation from friends and coworkers, enforced close contact with family, and reductions in mobility. Here we assess the extent to which people's evolutionarily-relevant basic motivations and goals-fundamental social motives such as Affiliation and Kin Care-might have been affected. To address this question, we gathered data on fundamental social motives in 42 countries (N = 15,915) across two waves, including 19 countries (N = 10,907) for which data were gathered both before and during the pandemic (pre-pandemic wave: 32 countries, N = 8998; 3302 male, 5585 female; M age  = 24.43, SD = 7.91; mid-pandemic wave: 29 countries, N = 6917; 2249 male, 4218 female; M age  = 28.59, SD = 11.31). Samples include data collected online (e.g., Prolific, MTurk), at universities, and via community sampling. We found that Disease Avoidance motivation was substantially higher during the pandemic, and that most of the other fundamental social motives showed small, yet significant, differences across waves. Most sensibly, concern with caring for one's children was higher during the pandemic, and concerns with Mate Seeking and Status were lower. Earlier findings showing the prioritization of family motives over mating motives (and even over Disease Avoidance motives) were replicated during the pandemic. Finally, well-being remained positively associated with family-related motives and negatively associated with mating motives during the pandemic, as in the pre-pandemic samples. Our results provide further evidence for the robust primacy of family-related motivations even during this unique disruption of social life.

Fundamental social motives measured across forty-two cultures in two waves.

How does psychology vary across human societies? The fundamental social motives framework adopts an evolutionary approach to capture the broad range of human social goals within a taxonomy of ancestrally recurring threats and opportunities. These motives-self-protection, disease avoidance, affiliation, status, mate acquisition, mate retention, and kin care-are high in fitness relevance and everyday salience, yet understudied cross-culturally. Here, we gathered data on these motives in 42 countries (N = 15,915) in two cross-sectional waves, including 19 countries (N = 10,907) for which data were gathered in both waves. Wave 1 was collected from mid-2016 through late 2019 (32 countries, N = 8,998; 3,302 male, 5,585 female; Mage = 24.43, SD = 7.91). Wave 2 was collected from April through November 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic (29 countries, N = 6,917; 2,249 male, 4,218 female; Mage = 28.59, SD = 11.31). These data can be used to assess differences and similarities in people's fundamental social motives both across and within cultures, at different time points, and in relation to other commonly studied cultural indicators and outcomes.

Baseline anxiety-sensitivity to estradiol fluctuations predicts anxiety symptom response to transdermal estradiol treatment in perimenopausal women - A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The menopausal transition (perimenopause) is associated with an increased risk of major depression, characterized by anxiety and anhedonia phenotypes. Greater estradiol (E2) variability predicts the development of perimenopausal depression, especially within the context of stressful life events (SLEs). While transdermal E2 (TE2) reduces perimenopausal depressive symptoms, the mechanisms underlying TE2 efficacy and predictors of TE2 treatment response remain unknown. This study aimed at determining relationships between E2 fluctuations, mood symptoms, and physiologic stress-reactivity (cortisol and interleukin-6) and whether differences in mood-sensitivity to E2 fluctuations predict mood responses to TE2 treatment. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated medically healthy women (46-60 years) in the early or late menopause transition. Baseline E2-sensitivity strength was calculated from eight weekly individual correlations between week-to-week E2 change and index week anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) and anhedonia (Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale). Women then received eight weeks of TE2 or transdermal placebo. RESULTS: Analyses included 73 women (active TE2 n = 35). Greater baseline E2 fluctuations predicted greater anhedonia (p = .002), particularly in women with more SLEs. Greater E2 fluctuations also predicted higher cortisol (p = .012) and blunted interleukin-6 (p = .02) stress-responses. Controlling for baseline symptoms, TE2 was associated with lower post-treatment anxiety (p < .001) and anhedonia (p < .001) versus placebo. However, the efficacy of TE2 for anxiety (p = .007) and also for somatic complaints (p = .05) was strongest in women with greater baseline E2 sensitivity strength. CONCLUSIONS: TE2 treatment reduced perimenopausal anxiety and anhedonia. The ability of baseline mood-sensitivity to E2 fluctuations to predict greater TE2 efficacy has implications for individualized treatment of perimenopausal anxiety disorders.

Potential solutions for screening, triage, and severity scoring of suspected COVID-19 positive patients in low-resource settings: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: Purposefully designed and validated screening, triage, and severity scoring tools are needed to reduce mortality of COVID-19 in low-resource settings (LRS). This review aimed to identify currently proposed and/or implemented methods of screening, triaging, and severity scoring of patients with suspected COVID-19 on initial presentation to the healthcare system and to evaluate the utility of these tools in LRS. DESIGN: A scoping review was conducted to identify studies describing acute screening, triage, and severity scoring of patients with suspected COVID-19 published between 12 December 2019 and 1 April 2021. Extracted information included clinical features, use of laboratory and imaging studies, and relevant tool validation data. PARTICIPANT: The initial search strategy yielded 15 232 articles; 124 met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Most studies were from China (n=41, 33.1%) or the United States (n=23, 18.5%). In total, 57 screening, 23 triage, and 54 severity scoring tools were described. A total of 51 tools-31 screening, 5 triage, and 15 severity scoring-were identified as feasible for use in LRS. A total of 37 studies provided validation data: 4 prospective and 33 retrospective, with none from low-income and lower middle-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a number of screening, triage, and severity scoring tools implemented and proposed for patients with suspected COVID-19. No tools were specifically designed and validated in LRS. Tools specific to resource limited contexts is crucial to reducing mortality in the current pandemic.

Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Agonism is Capable of Preventing Lipopolysaccharide Induced Decreases of Cochlear Microcirculation - A Potential Approach for Inner Ear Pathologies.

HYPOTHESIS: The ability of JWH-133, an agonist at the cannabinoid receptor 2, to abrogate the effects of lipopolysaccharide on cochlear microcirculation was investigated. BACKGROUND: Cochlear inflammation and subsequent impairment of microcirculation is part of numerous pathologies affecting inner ear function, including suppurative labyrinthitis, noise trauma, and sudden sensorineural hearing loss. One way of causing cochlear inflammation is exposing the cochlea to lipopolysaccharide, a bacterial endotoxin. METHODS: Twenty Dunkin-hartley guinea pigs were divided into four groups of five animals each. Two groups received topic treatment with JWH-133 and two received treatment with placebo. One group that had been treated with JWH-133 and one with placebo were then exposed to lipopolysaccharide or placebo, respectively. Cochlear microcirculation was quantified before, in between and after treatments by in vivo fluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: Significantly different changes in cochlear blood flow were only seen in the group that was treated with placebo and subsequently lipopolysaccharide. Every other group showed no significant change in cochlear blood flow. CONCLUSION: JWH-133 is capable of abrogating the effects of lipopolysaccharide on cochlear microcirculation. It may therefore be clinical interest in treating numerous inflammation associated cochlear pathologies.

University as Secret Society: Becoming Faculty Through Discretion.

Becoming a professor is complicated by a lack of clear guidelines for promotion to permanent status and, paradoxically, a surplus of mechanisms for institutional transparency. Drawing on Lilith Mahmud's anthropologies of discretion applied to secret societies like the Italian Freemasons, this paper compares becoming a professor to an initiate's journey toward becoming a member of a secret society. Membership in both requires a balance between knowing who to know and knowing the codes of what goes said and unsaid. These ways of knowing may manifest in mentor/mentee relations, in informal networks and communities of practice, or in acts of compliance and resistance to the neoliberal university.

A population-level analysis of the protective effects of androgen deprivation therapy against COVID-19 disease incidence and severity

ImportanceThe incidence and severity of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is higher in men. Sex hormones potentially offer one explanation for differences by sex. ObjectiveTo determine whether men exposed to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have lower incidence and severity of COVID-19. DesignWe conducted an observational study of male Veterans treated in the Veterans Health Administration from February 15th to July 15th, 2020. We developed a propensity score model to predict the likelihood to undergo Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing. We performed multivariable logistic regression modeling adjusted with inverse probability weighting to examine the relationship between ADT and COVID-19 incidence. We conducted logistic regression analysis among COVID-19 patients to test the association between ADT and COVID-19 severity. SettingThe U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ParticipantsThe study sample consisted of 6,250,417 male Veterans who were alive as of February 15, 2020. ExposureExposure to ADT was defined as having any prescription for a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogue or an antiandrogen in the six months prior to the index date. Main Outcomes and MeasuresTo assess incidence, we used a binary variable indicating any positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction SARS-CoV-2 test result through July 15, 2020. To measure severity, we constructed a binary variable indicating whether a patient was admitted to the intensive care unit, placed on mechanical ventilation, or dead in the 60 days following a positive test up to July 15, 2020. ResultsWe identified 246,087 patients who had been tested for SARS-CoV-2, of whom 3,057 were exposed to ADT, and 36,096 patients with cancer and no ADT exposure. Of these, 295 ADT patients and 2,427 other cancer patients had COVID-19 illness. In the primary, propensity-weighted comparison of ADT patients to cancer patients not on ADT, ADT was associated with decreased likelihood of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (adjusted OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.81-0.95]; p=0.001). ADT was associated with fewer severe COVID-19 outcomes (OR 0.72 [95% CI 0.53-0.96]; p=0.03). Conclusions and RelevanceADT is associated with reduced incidence and severity of COVID-19 amongst male Veterans. Repurposing of drugs that modulate androgen production and/or action may represent viable potential treatments for COVID-19. KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDoes androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) lower incidence and severity of COVID-19? FindingsIn this observational study of male Veterans treated in the Veterans Healthcare System, ADT was associated with decreased likelihood of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (adjusted OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.81-0.95]; p=0.001). ADT was also associated with fewer severe COVID-19 outcomes (OR 0.72 [95% CI 0.53-0.96]; p=0.03). MeaningThe use of androgen deprivation therapy may be protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection and modulate severity of COVID-19 outcomes.

The course of subjective and objective chemosensory dysfunction in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a 6-month follow-up.

PURPOSE: It has been established that the infection with SARS-CoV-2 may cause an impairment of chemosensory function. However, there is little data on the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on chemosensory function. METHODS: Twenty three SARS-CoV-2-positive patients diagnosed in spring 2020 with subjective hyposmia (out of 57 positive patients, 40.3%) were compared to SARS-CoV-2-positive patients without hyposmia (n = 19) and SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (n = 14). Chemosensory function was assessed by the Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT), Taste Strips (TS), Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), and the SNOT-22. The initial cohort with hyposmia were also examined at 8 weeks and 6 months after initial examination. RESULTS: There were no differences between the SARS-CoV-2-positive cohort without hyposmia and negative controls in terms of BSIT (8.5 ± 2.6 vs. 10.2 ± 1.8), TS (3.4 ± 0.6 vs. 3.9 ± 0.3) or VAS (2.1 ± 1.3 vs. 1.1 ± 0.5); yet the SNOT-22 was significantly elevated (27.7 ± 11.2 vs. 16.4 ± 10.8). The SARS-CoV-2-positive group with hyposmia performed significantly poorer in BSIT (4.0 ± 1.7 vs. 8.5 ± 2.6/10.2 ± 1.8), TS (2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 3.4 ± 0.6/3.9 ± 0.3), and VAS (7.9 ± 2.2 vs. 2.1 ± 1.3/1.1 ± 0.5) compared to both control groups. At week 8 and month 6 control, six and five patients, respectively, still suffered from subjectively and objectively impaired chemosensory function. The other patients had recovered in both respects. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 patients with subjectively impaired chemosensory function regularly perform poorly in objective measurements. About 70% of patients suffering from olfactory dysfunction in SARS-CoV-2 quickly recover-the rest still suffers from considerable impairment 6 months after infection.

Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Salivary Glands.

BACKGROUND: Cancer stem cells (CSC) are cells that exhibit stem cell properties and are pivotal in tumor biology. CSC markers have been described for many tumorous entities. However, to this date, there is no data on CSC markers in respect to squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the salivary glands. METHODS: Histologic samples from patients with salivary gland SCCs were stained for CSC markers (ALDH-1/BMI-1/SOX-2/CD-44/vimentin) and divided into high and low expression subgroups. These were then correlated with tumor and patient characteristics as well as overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival, recurrence-free survival and local control rates (LCR) after 3 and 5 years. RESULTS: Overall, 31 samples were included. CD-44 and ALDH-1 expression were associated with tumor origin (metastatic/primary disease, p = 0.048 and p = 0.011, respectively). Strong BMI-1 expression was associated with poorer OS (62.9 vs. 27.3%, p = 0.029), strong SOX-2 expression was associated with poorer LCR (62.5 vs. 21.9%, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: CD-44 and ALDH-1 may be useful in differentiating between primary SCCs and metastatic disease. BMI-1 and SOX-2 are correlated with poorer prognosis.

Lipopolysaccharide decreases cochlear blood flow dose dependently in a guinea pig animal model via TNF signaling.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a bacterial endotoxin on cochlear microcirculation, and its mode of action. METHODS: Twenty-five Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs were divided into five groups of five animals each. After surgical preparation, cochlear microcirculation was quantified by in vivo fluorescence microscopy. Placebo or LPS (1 mg, 10 µg, and 100 ng) was applied topically, and microcirculation was measured before and twice after application. A fifth group was pretreated with etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist, and afterward the lowest LPS concentrations that yielded significant results (10 µg) were applied. RESULTS: In the groups that had been treated with 1 mg and 10 µg LPS, a significant drop in cochlear microcirculation was observed after 30 (.791 ± .089 Arbitrary Units (AU), compared to baseline, and .888 ± .071AU) and 60 (.756 ± .101 AU and .817 ± .124 AU, respectively) minutes. The groups that had been treated with 100 ng LPS and that had been pretreated with etanercept showed no significant change in cochlear blood flow compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Lipopolysaccharide shows a dose-dependent effect on cochlear microcirculation; this effect can already be observed after 30 min. Pretreatment with etanercept can abrogate this effect, indicating that TNF mediates the effect of LPS on cochlear microcirculation.

Intratympanal administration of lidocaine in the management of Ménière's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Ménière's Disease (MD) is a chronic condition where patients suffer recurrent vertigo attacks. Evidence for treatment concepts are to this date low. AIMS/OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of intratympanic lidocaine injections to reduce the number of attacks. METHODS: Twenty patients diagnosed with definitive MD that were treated with 34 intratympanic lidocaine injections were included. Main outcome measures were the number of vertigo attacks in the previous four weeks, the attack free period and the subjective improvement of the condition. RESULTS: Mean follow up after first lidocaine injection was 25.3 months (±22.2; range 1.9-79.7). Patients expressed subjective improvement in overall situation, vertigo, and aural fullness. The number of vertigo attacks before each assessment decreased from 7.1 (±5.9; range 2-20) per months at baseline to 1.9 (±3.8; range 0-15). 25% of the patients suffered no further attacks, the other patients had an average attack free period of 7.8 months (±15.4; range 0.2-58.4). Hearing thresholds remained unaffected. Repetitive injections proved effective. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Intratympanic lidocaine is an effective nonsurgical and non-ablative therapy for MD. When patients experience an increase of attacks repetitive injections promise improvement.

Patient Perspectives and Preferences Regarding Gout and Gout Management:Impact on Adherence

Background@#Patient-centered management is becoming increasingly important in gout, but there are limited studies exploring patients' perspectives and preferences. We aimed to investigate patients' perspectives and preferences regarding gout and gout management, and their impacts on adherence to urate lowering therapy (ULT). @*Methods@#A paper-based survey was performed in patients with gout seen at the rheumatology outpatient clinics of 16 tertiary hospitals. The survey included questions regarding demographics, comorbidities, gout attacks, current treatment and adherence, and patients' perspectives and preferences regarding gout and gout management. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with ULT adherence. @*Results@#Of 809 surveyed patients with gout, 755 (94.5%) were using ULT. Among those using ULT, 89.1% had ≥ 80% adherence to ULT. Majority of the patients knew management strategies to some extent (94.8%), perceived gout as a life-long disease (91.2%), and were making efforts toward practicing at least one lifestyle modification (89.2%). Most patients (71.9%) obtained information about gout management during their clinic visits.Approximately half of the patients (53.6%) preferred managing their disease with both ULT and lifestyle modification, 28.4% preferred ULT only, and 17.4% preferred lifestyle modification only. Adherence was better in patients with older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03), those with better knowledge of gout management strategies (OR, 3.56), and those who had preference for ULT (OR, 2.07). @*Conclusion@#Patients' perspectives and management preferences had high impacts on adherence to ULT in gout. Consideration of patients' perspectives and preferences is important for achieving the desired clinical outcome in gout.

Patient Perspectives and Preferences Regarding Gout and Gout Management:Impact on Adherence

Background@#Patient-centered management is becoming increasingly important in gout, but there are limited studies exploring patients' perspectives and preferences. We aimed to investigate patients' perspectives and preferences regarding gout and gout management, and their impacts on adherence to urate lowering therapy (ULT). @*Methods@#A paper-based survey was performed in patients with gout seen at the rheumatology outpatient clinics of 16 tertiary hospitals. The survey included questions regarding demographics, comorbidities, gout attacks, current treatment and adherence, and patients' perspectives and preferences regarding gout and gout management. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with ULT adherence. @*Results@#Of 809 surveyed patients with gout, 755 (94.5%) were using ULT. Among those using ULT, 89.1% had ≥ 80% adherence to ULT. Majority of the patients knew management strategies to some extent (94.8%), perceived gout as a life-long disease (91.2%), and were making efforts toward practicing at least one lifestyle modification (89.2%). Most patients (71.9%) obtained information about gout management during their clinic visits.Approximately half of the patients (53.6%) preferred managing their disease with both ULT and lifestyle modification, 28.4% preferred ULT only, and 17.4% preferred lifestyle modification only. Adherence was better in patients with older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03), those with better knowledge of gout management strategies (OR, 3.56), and those who had preference for ULT (OR, 2.07). @*Conclusion@#Patients' perspectives and management preferences had high impacts on adherence to ULT in gout. Consideration of patients' perspectives and preferences is important for achieving the desired clinical outcome in gout.

Clinical influences of anticentromere antibody on primary Sjögren’s syndrome in a prospective Korean cohort

This study was performed to clarify inf luences of anticentromere antibody (ACA) on clinical phenotypes of primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) patients in Korea. Methods: We assessed 318 patients who met the 2016 American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for pSS. All patients were selected from the Korean Initiative of primary Sjögren’s Syndrome (KISS), a prospective cohort. Among them, 53 patients were positive for ACA, while another 265 patients were not. We compared various clinical data including demographic features, extra-glandular manifestations (EGMs), clinical indices, and laboratory values available from the KISS database between the two groups. Results: Patients in the ACA-positive pSS group were older (p = 0.042), and had higher xerostomia inventory scores (p = 0.040), whereas glandular dysfunction represented with Schirmer I test was more severe in the ACA-negative group. More frequent Raynaud’s phenomenon and liver involvement (both p < 0.001) and less articular involvement (p = 0.037) were observed among the EGMs in the ACA-positive group. Less frequency of leukopenia (p = 0.021), rheumatoid factor (p < 0.001), anti-Ro/SSA antibody positivity (p < 0.001), and hypergammaglobulinemia (p = 0.006), as well as higher positivity rates of anti-nuclear antibody and anti- topoisomerase antibody (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively) were found in the laboratory data in the ACA-positive pSS group. Conclusions: Considering distinct phenotypes in hematological and serological features and EGMs, we should monitor the occurrence of these clinical features among pSS patients with ACA in caution.